Remembering Khan v McCloskey – The night that sparked the Khan-Hearn feud


They have verbally sparred over the years and it would be an understatement to say that Eddie Hearn and Amir Khan weren’t bosom buddies – so it came as a bit of a surprise that the Matchroom boss added the global name and I’m A Celeb star to his roster yesterday.

The move makes business and boxing sense as Khan gets a return to the blossoming British market, while Hearn adds a former world champion with massive American appeal to his stable of fighters.

Regardless of how beneficial it appeared to both, eyebrows were still raised when the deal was announced with people expressing surprise the pair were able to put their differences behind them.

Most of the animosity between the pair revolved around Kell Brook and his regular link to the Bolton fighter.

However, Hearn revealed the aforementioned differences have their roots in an Irish fighter.

Ryan Burnett and Katie Taylor’s current promoter claims the roots of his sour relationship with Khan stemmed from all the way back in April of 2011 after the Olympic silver medalist’s WBA World light welterweight title defence against Derry’s Paul McCloskey.

“Look, it’s not a secret – everybody wanted the signature of Amir Khan. He spoke to people on both sides of the Atlantic. It surprises people, this deal, because probably dating back to the Paul McCloskey fight, we’ve always had our differences. And, of course, the Kell Brook is a fight we’ve tried to make for years and years,” Hearn told Sky.

Dungiven’s McCloskey traveled with an army of Irish fans to Manchester back in 2011 to challenge Khan for the WBA strap. The fight was quite literally cut short much to the disgust of Team McCloskey, the Hearns, Irish fight fans and even the Irish media at the venue.

A clash of heads in the sixth saw the referee pull McCloskey out and the verdict went to the cards with Khan winning a unanimous technical decision

Such was the ire of the Irish media post fight that their British counterparts became disgruntled and demanded a ban on rematch questions at the post fight press conference.

A young Hearn wasn’t going to let up and was more than content to scream injustice directly after the clash and sang off the same hymn sheet during the days and weeks that followed.

Hearn lodged a complaint with the British Boxing Board of Control within minutes of the final bell in the MEN Arena. The Matchroom boss, whose father Barry came close to trading blows with Khan’s management directly after the bout, stressed the Board had agreed to undergo an investigation with the WBA with a view to securing a rematch.

Hearn, then trying to forge a reputation as a big promoter, even claimed the officials showed such a degree of ineptitude in stopping the light welterweight title fight that they should consider a change in profession.

Speaking after the clash, Hearn passionately questioned: “Will we get a rematch? Most likely not.”

“Does Paul McCloskey deserve one?”

“Certainly. Will we fight to try ensure he gets another chance? Of course that is what we do for our fighters.”

“We have already spoken with the board and they have confirmed the will ask for a full explanation from the WBA. It was a very strange end to the fight. Normally they take the fighter to the corner and have a look at the cut.”

“I don’t understand why they didn’t do that. Paul has trained since he was six years old to be a world champ and you don’t give him 30 seconds to finish the round or give the corner the opportunity to try and do something is a disgrace, Hearn explained before suggesting the decision would have been different if their was a cut role reversal.”

“If Khan would have suffered a similar cut there is no chance this fight would have been stopped. Paul was confident of winning the fight since it was made. He was confident in the ring and during the ring walk. Okay he was behind on points, but he wasn’t being outclassed.”

“We all know Khan is a fast starter and Paul is a strong finisher, the fight was by no means over. I am very disappointed with Amir Khan and Freddie Roach for suggesting on radio straight after the fight that Paul wanted to quit. That certainly isn’t the case and I want everyone to know that.”

An incensed yet optimistic Hearn did try and take some positives out of was ultimately a disastrous clash claiming if nothing else McCloskey had proved his World title credentials.

The Matchroom man also had his first taste of Irish support and – although he was the panto villain the next time the Irish fight fan invaded Manchester for Carl Frampton’s victory over Scott Quigg – the promoter did expressed some fan love after the fight.

Indeed if that HBO-aired clash was the start of Hearn and Khan’s ‘differences’ it might also have been the start of the promoter’s Irish fan respect.

“The Irish fans were also unbelievable. It is unprecedented in boxing. They came over in their thousands and created an atmosphere that made the hairs on your neck stand up. No other fans would travel like that, you wouldn’t get that in an away game in a football match.”

“The fact it wasn’t on Sky is another shame cause with a bigger TV audience that crowd would have made fighters and certainly promoters sit up and take note. They would be saying Paul is a credible performer and a great ticket seller and other champions would certainly be tempted into fighting him.”

irishboxing

Integral part of the Irish boxing community for over 13 years